
The Global Toll of Giving Birth
Discover the countries supporting new families with the best access to maternity leave, childcare and medical expenses
The toll of starting a family is rising almost everywhere in the world. From medical bills and childcare to lost income during parental leave, the cost of giving birth worldwide has become a growing financial pressure for parents. At the same time, global awareness of maternal health has sharpened, with policymakers, employers and families paying closer attention to gaps in care, support and safety reflected in the maternal mortality rate across countries. Against this backdrop, a new study by health insurance comparison service iSelect has resulted in the Global Toll of Giving Birth Index.
This new data-driven ranking of countries and US states evaluates how affordable, supported and safe it is to give birth today. The index brings together key indicators spanning medical expenses, income replacement, maternity leave by country, childcare affordability and maternal health outcomes. Together, these factors offer a clearer picture of the real-world pressures facing new parents.
The findings also reveal stark contrasts. In Australia, childcare costs equate to around 10% of the average wage, while in the United States it rises to approximately 40%, highlighting the scale of childbirth costs USA families face even after delivery. By comparison, Germany’s figure sits at just 1%, underlining how policy choices and social support can dramatically reduce financial strain. These disparities help to explain why some nations are consistently ranked among the best countries for maternity, while others continue to leave families absorbing the bulk of the cost themselves.
The Global Toll of Giving Birth Index ranks countries globally and US states separately based on three core pillars: affordability, parental support and maternal safety. Using publicly available data, each location was scored across cost, maternity leave provision and maternal health indicators. These figures were normalised and combined into an overall score out of 100 to allow fair comparison across different healthcare systems.
By comparing affordability, policy support and safety side by side, the rankings shine a light on where parents are most protected, as well as where the financial and health risks of childbirth remain highest.
The best countries for maternity
Based on affordability, parental support and safety, the Global Toll of Giving Birth Index highlights clear leaders in managing the cost of giving birth worldwide while delivering strong health outcomes for mothers.
1. Norway – Score: 92.13
Norway ranks first overall, with childcare costs averaging just 7% of wages, along with 49 weeks of paid maternity leave and a maternal mortality rate of 1 per 100,000 births. These strong figures place Norway among the world’s leading countries for affordability, support and maternal safety.
2. Greece – Score: 84.75
Greece places second, combining low childcare costs of 6% of wages with 43 weeks of paid maternity leave and a maternal mortality rate of 5 per 100,000 births. This reflects the impact of strong statutory support for new mothers.
3. United Kingdom – Score: 69.90
The UK ranks third, with childcare costs equivalent to 14% of wages, 39 weeks of paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 8 per 100,000 births. This positions the United Kingdom among the best countries for maternity despite higher childcare expenses.
4. Iceland – Score: 69.19
Iceland comes in at number four, supported by low childcare costs of 5% of wages, 26 weeks of paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 3 per 100,000 births, underlining its strong maternal healthcare standards.
5. Italy – Score: 67.92
Italy completes the top five, with childcare costs effectively at 0% of wages, 21 weeks of paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 6 per 100,000 births. Though mothers receive less time off work, they benefit from lower ongoing childcare expenses.
The worst country for maternity
By contrast, the United States ranks last worldwide, with a score of just 7.39, which is due to exceptionally high childcare costs of around 40% of wages, an average of 12 weeks of paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 17 per 100,000 births. This reinforces the scale of childbirth costs in the USA compared with other developed nations.
How Australia compares
With a score of 49.47, Australia places 25th overall (out of 33 countries), with childcare costs accounting for around 10% of wages, 12 weeks of paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 2 per 100,000 births, highlighting how affordability pressures persist despite strong safety outcomes.
How the cost of giving birth differs in US states
While the United States ranks poorly overall, several states stand out for offering comparatively lower birth costs, stronger maternity leave policies and safer outcomes for mothers.
Here are the highest-ranking regions.
1. Maryland – Score: 85.13
Maryland ranks first nationally, with an average birth cost of US$16,190, mandatory paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 21 per 100,000 births. This places it at the top of the US index despite higher mortality figures than global leaders.
2. Delaware – Score: 79.55
Delaware is second in the USA, combining an average birth cost of US$19,425 with mandatory paid maternity leave and a maternal mortality rate of 17 per 100,000 births. This reflects relatively strong policy support by US standards.
3. Rhode Island – Score: 76.25
Rhode Island has average birth costs of US$20,073, mandatory paid maternity leave, and a maternal mortality rate of 17 per 100,000 births. Though costs are on the higher end of the scale, the combination of these factors makes it one of the more balanced states for affordability and support.
4. Maine – Score: 71.55
Maine places fourth despite higher average birth costs of US$22,453, supported by mandatory paid maternity leave. The maternal mortality rate here is 12 per 100,000 births, which is one of the lower figures among US states.
5. Alabama – Score: 71.01
Despite paid maternity leave being voluntary, Alabama completes the top five, with relatively low average birth costs of US$14,343. However, a high maternal mortality rate of 39 per 100,000 births highlights ongoing safety challenges despite its overall ranking.
The states with the highest childbirth costs in the USA
Looking at the financial cost of childbirth alone, not including maternity leave expectations, several states illustrate a heavier strain that most within the United States.
New Jersey (index score of 36.84) records the highest average cost of birth at US$33,122, alongside mandatory paid maternity leave and a maternal mortality rate of 26 per 100,000 births.
Alaska (7.08) follows closely in terms of financial pressures, with average birth costs of US$32,473, voluntary paid maternity leave and a maternal mortality rate of 25 per 100,000 births, ranking last overall in the index.
New York (39.71) also features among the most expensive, with average birth costs of US$31,345, mandatory paid maternity leave and a maternal mortality rate of 22 per 100,000 births.
California (44.52) rounds out the group, where average birth costs reach US$30,496 despite mandatory paid maternity leave and a comparatively lower maternal mortality rate of 11 per 100,000 births.
Planning for birth with confidence
Across both global and US rankings, the data highlights a clear pattern. Where public policy and healthcare systems fall short, families are more exposed to the overall toll of giving birth worldwide and the financial risks that follow. In countries and regions with limited paid leave or high medical fees, health insurance often becomes a critical safety net. The right cover can help to manage childbirth costs, reduce out-of-pocket expenses and provide access to private maternity care.
As disparities in affordability, maternity leave by country and the maternal mortality rate persist, understanding what coverage is available is an increasingly important step for parents planning for a family.

“Giving birth should be a time of focus on health and family, not financial stress. Our research shows just how much location can influence the overall toll on expectant parents, both financially and otherwise.
“Comparing health insurance options early can help families to feel more informed, prepared and supported during one of life’s biggest milestones.”
General Manager – Health at iSelect
Written by:
Sarah Grealy
Digital Public Relations Specialist
0413 363 690
Sarah is our Digital Public Relations Specialist, and brings more than a decade of experience in the insurance comparison industry to iSelect.
With a passion for storytelling through data-driven insights, Sarah strives to empower Aussies with practical guides and tips.
About the data
This dataset ranks countries globally and US states separately based on affordability, parental support, and maternal safety when having a child. Two distinct rankings were produced due to differences in available data sources and healthcare systems: A global ranking of countries and a USA-specific ranking of states. Each ranking uses three key factors.
All data was collected from publicly available sources and normalised to a score between 0 and 1. These scores were then combined to give each location a total score out of 100, and locations were ranked from best to worst overall. The aim of the index is to assess how affordable, supported, and safe it is to give birth in each location using comparable, high-level indicators.
Global ranking factors
The factors used for the global ranking were:
- Childcare cost (% of average wage) – The average cost of childcare as a percentage of the national average wage. This is used as a proxy for the ongoing financial burden of raising a child.
- Paid maternity leave (legal entitlement) – Whether paid maternity leave is provided by law, and the length of leave available where applicable. This reflects the level of structural support offered to new mothers.
- Maternal mortality rate (per 100,000 live births) – The number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births, used as a measure of safety and quality of maternal healthcare.
USA ranking factors
The factors used for the USA-specific ranking were:
- Average cost of birth (vaginal & C-section) – The average cost of giving birth, combining vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
- Paid maternity leave (employer legal obligation) – Whether employers are legally required to provide paid maternity leave, including cases where this applies only to public-sector employees.
- Maternal death rate (per 100,000 births) – The number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births by state.
Scoring and weighting
Each factor was normalised to a 0–1 scale and combined using weighted scoring to produce a total score out of 100 for each location.
Global ranking weights
- Childcare cost (% of average wage): 45%
- Paid maternity leave (legal entitlement, weeks): 45%
- Maternal mortality rate: 10%
Childcare costs and maternity leave were weighted equally, as both represent major long-term structural factors affecting the affordability and support available to new parents. Maternity leave data also varies significantly between countries in both availability and duration, making it a strong differentiator globally. Maternal mortality was included as a safety and healthcare quality indicator but given a lower weight to avoid overpowering cost and policy factors.
USA ranking weights
- Average cost of birth (vaginal & C-section): 60%
- Paid maternity leave (employer legal obligation): 30%
- Maternal death rate: 10%
Birth cost was given the highest weight as it represents the most direct and immediate financial barrier faced by parents in the US healthcare system. Paid maternity leave was weighted lower than in the global ranking because the data reflects legal obligation status (mandatory, public-sector only, or voluntary) rather than the length or generosity of leave, resulting in less variation between states. Maternal mortality was again included as a safety indicator with a consistent 10% weighting.
Indexing rules
- Lower is better for childcare costs.
- Lower is better for average birth costs.
- Higher is better for paid maternity leave provision.
- Lower is better for maternal mortality rates.
Data notes
All data reflects the most recent release available from each source at the time of analysis. Rankings are based purely on the indicators listed and do not account for cultural, social, or individual circumstances that may also affect the experience of giving birth. For US states with very small numbers of maternal deaths, rates may be statistically unstable. These were still calculated using official birth and death totals but should be interpreted with caution. Data is accurate as of 26/01/2026.
Sources
- Global ranking Childcare cost (% of average wage)
- OECD – Childcare costs and family database Paid maternity leave (legal entitlement)
- World Population Review – Maternity leave by country Maternal mortality rate
- World Bank – World Development Indicators (maternal mortality ratio) USA ranking
- Average cost of birth (vaginal & C-section)
- World Population Review – Cost of childbirth by state Paid maternity leave (employer legal obligation)
- World Population Review – US maternity leave laws by state Maternal mortality rate
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Maternal mortality by state sources
- https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT
- https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/paid-maternity-leave-by-state
- https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/cost-of-having-a-baby-by-state
- https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/maternal-mortality/mmr-2018-2022-state-data.pdf
- https://www.oecd.org/en/data/indicators/net-childcare-costs.html
- https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/maternity-leave-by-country
iSelect does not compare all health insurance providers or policies in the market. The availability of policies will change from time to time. Not all policies available from its providers are compared by iSelect and due to commercial arrangements, your stated needs and circumstances, not all policies compared by iSelect are available to all customers. Some policies and special offers are available only from iSelect’s contact centre or website. Click here to view iSelect’s range of providers